The Canon 400 f/5.6 Lens is often overlooked as a choice lens for wildlife and bird photography. It costs less than half the price of the Canon EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 IS II, but is it still worth it?
After all, It has no zoom capabilities, it's maximum aperture is only f5.6, and it has no image stabilization. Well, what does it have going for it? Probably the three most important features that a lens should have:
1. SHARPNESS. It's a really sharp lens, even when you shoot it with the aperture set wide open.
2. AFFORDABILITY. It's also relatively very affordable. To get this much magnification at this price make it a favorite for beginners in wildlife and bird photography.
3. USABILITY. It's light and easy to carry. The faster 400mm lenses are downright bulky and heavy to lug around. This lens longer but weighs less than the 70-200mm f/2.8 lens.
Generally speaking, most lenses are sharpest when they are stopped down about two stops from their maximum aperture. With a lens that has a maximum aperture of f2.8, that would be f5.6.
The technical lens testers out there in the world of scientific lens testing have determined that the Canon 5.6 has excellent sharpness, wide-open at f 5.6, even in the corners of your image.
At 400mm you still get great bokeh at f5.6 with the 8-bladed aperture. This has been verified by many of the everyday photographers like me, the Canon Geek.
I don't recommend you carry it this way, but it is light enough to carry with your pinky finger.
This lens weighs about 2.75 pounds, a few ounces less than the Canon 70-200 f 2.8, one of the all-time best rated lenses Canon has ever produced.
Compare that to the Canon 400mm f4 DO IS that weighs close to double that at 4.28 pounds. The Canon 400mm f2.8 L IS II comes in at a romping 8.5 pounds.
Compared to the 85mm f1.8, the 400mm f5.6 is a monster. Relative to the 70-200mm f2.8, the Canon 400 f5.6 lens is only slighter longer, but slightly lighter than the 70-200 f2.8 lens.
The 400mm f2.8
The 300mm f2.8
The 400mm f5.6
The Canon 400mm f2.8 costs over $10,000.00. The 300mm f/2.8 lens costs over $7,000. The 400mm f 5.6 is a little over $1,000.00.
Here are the disadvantages of using the Canon EF 400mm f/5.6 Lens.
No zoom. Not as versatile as the 100-400. It's why I sold my Canon 400mm and bought a Tamron 150-600mm f/5.0-6.3
Forces you to be in a good position for good composition and cropping.
Despite the disadvantages, 83% of Amazon reviewers gave this lens a 5-star rating and 94% rate it at 4 or 5 star.
Here is the ubiquitous un-boxing of the lens:
The Canon 400 f5.6 lens is certainly an interesting consideration, limited to specific uses for sports photographers, wildlife photographers and bird geeks like me.
The maximum aperture and no image stabilization mechanism are not issues in any way at all for me personally. My Canon 5D Mark III is remarkably sharp with low noise at high ISO settings.
I love the weight and sharp, USM ring-type, quick focusing that this lens gives me. Chromatic aberration is minimal. This lens produces good saturation and contrast.
Canon 400mm f5.6 wide open produced good sharpness on the cardinal.
At such a close distance and wide open, depth of field is limited.
You can see that because of the extreme shallow depth of field that the sparrow was out of the plane of good focus.
You get great bokeh with the lens. Here are some more sample photos with the Canon f5.6 lens. You can also learn a lot about camera accessories by reading up on the reviews by photographers who have purchased them on Amazon.
As an Amazon affiliate Canon Camera Geek receives a small commission from qualifying purchases, at NO added cost to you.
You can get some good ideas on what people like and dislike about any product by going to on-line retailers and reading reviews from consumers. Please visit one of my preferred vendors below. Good places to buy Canon equipment and it helps keep this web site going. Thanks. Keep shooting your Canon!
Jul 23, 21 09:00 PM
Canon 70-200 f2.8 L IS USM Lens Review.The f/2.8 vs. F/4.0 vs. other cheaper alternatives Non-technical lens evaluation to help you decide what the best lens is for you to purchase.
Jul 23, 21 02:20 PM
Wondering if a 1.4x teleconverter would work using an M 6 mark II mirrorless camera with an ef converter and a 70-200 ef lens. Hi John, Although I have
Jul 19, 21 06:09 AM
Find Out How To Use Canon Camera As A WebCam. It depnds on the exact Canon camera you have.
This page may contain affiliate links that pay me a small commission. They cost you nothing, but please review the affiliate statement at the very bottom of this page if you want more information.