This page may contain affiliate links that pay me a small commission. There is no cost to you. You can review the affiliate statement at the very bottom of this page if you want more information. As an Amazon affiliate Canon Camera Geek may earn a small commission from qualifying purchases, at NO added cost to you.
Canon 70-200 f/2.8 Vs. Canon 80-200 f/2.8L lens
by Eric Peterson
(Wall, NJ USA)
Canon EF 70-200mm vs EF 80-200mm lens
Was looking for information on the comparison between a 70-200 2.8L (white lens) and the 80-200 2.8L lens (black lens). Both canon lenses.
Hi Eric!
Thanks for asking about a comparison of the Canon EF 80-200mm f/2.8 L lens and the Canon EF 70-200mm L lens. I've never used a 80-200 lens, but have used both the f/4.0 and one of the 70-200mm f/2.8 lenses quite a bit. There are 4 versions of the 70-200mm f/2.8 lens. The first (1995) does not have image stabilization.
Canon EF 70-200 Vs. EF 80-200
Likely the most glaring difference between them for most photographers is the lack of image stabilization (IS) in the 80-200mm lens. The 70-200mm lenses, that were released in 2001, 2010, and 2018, have image stabilization. That's a feature we're all accustomed to benefitting from these days.The 80-200 also does not have any weather sealing. If you never shoot in rain/snow/dusty conditions that's not a big deal.
Additionally, it would make sense that the optical design and materials (low dispersion glass) used for the more recently released 70-200 lenses will give you better image quality, although there can be variations within each lens model and the 80-200 lens is reportedly sharp.
I have done no testing on this, but it is possible the 70-200mm lenses are faster focusing. The 80-200mm's auto-focus was a big deal at the time and helped Canon grab some Nikon shooters away from the dark side. The 70-200mm lenses also include instant manual-focus override.
In terms of optical performance, none of these lens show much with defects. Chromatic aberrations, distortions and light fall-off issues are minimal according to the geeky lens testers who test them. Here is a recently discovered review of the Canon 80-200mm lens.
Eric, I hope this helps you. Good luck and let me know how you make out. Thanks, Bruce
RELATED
Canon 70-200 Or Alternative
The More Affordable 70-200mm f/4.0
Bruce Lovelace is the publisher of Canon Camera Geek. Read more about him on the About Page. He also publishes how to articles and camera gear reviews at the Photography Tips website.
View some of Bruce's photos on Instagram and Flickr. Join the tribe of followers on YouTube. Bruce also runs photo workshops and provides 1 on 1 digital photography coaching.
You might like these
Best Canon EOS Lenses For Beginners. Which Canon Lens to Start With
Depending on what type of photography you are doing, here are the best Canon EOS lenses for beginners, including portraits, landscapes, macro, and....
Comparison Between Canon Teleconverters and Extension Tubes
They sound the same, but they're very different. Helpful comparison of Canon Teleconverter and extension tubes.
Canon 1.4x Extender Test. Side by Side Comparison With and Without
You're wondering how the 1.4x Extender II would perform in terms of sharpness. Check out my side by side comparison Canon 1.4x Extender Test
Is The Canon 16-35mm Lens Worth It? What's It Good For?
Take a practical look at this wide angle zoom and see if the Canon 16-35mm lens is worth it and what kind of photography it's good for-then decide which is best
Best Canon Lens For Low Light Photography. Lenses For Dark Situations
List of Canon lenses that work well in dark photography situations. Best Canon Lens For Low Light Photography Situations.
KEH: WHERE I BUY CANON GEAR
"I've found that the condition of the used equipment from KEH is excellent and a whole lot cheaper than buying new" - Bruce, the Canon Camera Geek
You might also like:
Canon Polarizing Filters. Are They Any good And Worth It? My Results.
What do these lens filters do for you? Research into the value of using one of the Canon polarizing filters on your lens.
DON'T Buy a Canon Digital Camera Accessory Kit Until You Read This
You've got your digital camera. Should you get extras separately or go with a Canon Digital Camera Accessory Kit
How Do Canon Extension Tubes Work. Are They Any Good And Alternatives
Are they any good and how do Canon extnesion tubes work? Should you get the tubes made by a 3rd party or go with the extension tubes made by Canon
Two Canon Tripods Choices And Alternatives You Can Get. Helpful Guide
Are the Canon tripods any good? Can you abandon your loyalty to Canon when it comes to getting a tripod for your Canon camera?
Which Canon Rebel Accessories Are Good Which Are Worthless For 2024
Are you looking for the best Canon Rebel Accessories? Get an overview of possibilities here. Read this first.
Search for articles on this Site:
Recent Articles
-
My Review of The 10 Best Canon R6 Mark II Features That Impressed Me
Apr 12, 25 08:51 AM
Beyond the Pixel: Discover the Game-Changing Features That Make the Canon R6 Mark II a Must Have Camera -
Canon RF 24-105 Lens Comparison. Guide To Which One Is Right For You
Apr 07, 25 12:47 PM
Which is the best of the 3 versions of the Canon RF 24-105mm Lens for Canon mirrorless cameras? What's The 24-105 Lens Good For -
3 Better Alternatives to Camera Bags From Canon. Helpful Guide To Bags
Apr 03, 25 11:51 AM
After searching for the top best selling Canon bags, I found 3 better alternatives to camera bags from Canon -
Canon 70-200 2.8 Tripod Collar. Article and Video of The Advantages
Apr 03, 25 11:02 AM
Some call it an optional accessory. I say a canon 70-200 2.8 tripod collar is a necessity when using this lens on a tripod or monopod. -
Running With The G1X Mark II, Acting Like a Kid, You Should Try This
Apr 03, 25 10:31 AM
Ever get a new "toy" and want to just play? I did.Got my new Canon compact camera. Went running with the G1x Mark II